Weather Magnet

News
Print this story  |  Email this story  |  [+] Text Size [-]  

Oregon group finds problems with petition



PORTLAND (AP) — A union-backed group says signature-gathering efforts for nine of the 10 measures slated for the November ballot were riddled with fraud and forgery.

All nine measures in question are sponsored by conservative activists.

But Don Hamilton, a spokesman for Democratic Secretary of State Bill Bradbury, was far more cautious Tuesday, saying most of the problems uncovered via a public records search by the left-leaning group Our Oregon date from before rigorous new rules on initiatives went into effect Jan 1.

‘‘(Secretary Bradbury) does not see anything that is going to come under investigation for criminal fraud, because these were collected before the law changed,’’ Hamilton said.

The initiatives in question are sponsored by a clutch of conservatives, including anti-tax activist Russ Walker, former Oregon Republican Party chair Kevin Mannix and former Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill Sizemore. The proposals deal with a wide range of subjects, such as basing teacher salaries on classroom performance, curtailing bilingual education and imposing stricter sentences for property and drug crimes.

Scott Moore, a spokesman for Our Oregon, said the group’s examination turned up a ‘‘pretty clear pattern that there has been some forgery, no matter what the date is on the calendar.  Among the trends identified by Our Oregon:

— Petition sheets were copied using carbon paper, potentially allowing a signature given to just one initiative to be duplicated on a handful of others.

— Voters who sign petition sheets must also print their names and addresses; handwriting analysis suggests others might have sometimes handled that part of the task.

— Each signature gatherer must sign a sheet when they finish filling it with names. Moore said someone appeared to forge the name of a signature gatherer.

Sizemore denied any wrongdoing Tuesday, saying he was the victim of a vendetta.




Comment Blog - Note: All Comments Subject To Approval


TERMS OF USE

Those who post comments are accountable for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they furnish. While we encourage writers to utilize this service on our Web site, we also strongly suggest they treat it as public forum where good taste counts. We reserve the right to decline for approval objectionable material from these blogs.

Writers that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments - such as racists language, threats or comments unrelated to the story - will not be approved for the blogs. Also, entries that are unsigned or "signatures" by someone other than the actual writer will not be approved.

While writers can still post anonymously, we strongly suggest that they do not do so.

Opinions, guidance and other information expressed in Argus Observer story blog comments and on the Argus Observer blogs represent the individuals' own views and not necessarily those of the Argus Observer. The Argus Observer furnishes this type of forum and does not endorse and is not accountable for statements or advice from anyone other than an designated Argus Observer spokesperson.


(optional)
   

All Newspaper Ads
Place a classified ad

Community Calendar
November 2009
S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

» This Week's Events
» Submit an Event
Click to View All Events

Business Directory
Find a business near you
Business Type

OR Business Name

Web Search
Google
 

Find out about our RSS feeds and what they are.

Copyright © 2009 Argus Observer - www.argusobserver.com. All rights reserved. | Unathorized reproduction is prohibited.